Difference between revisions of "Evidentiality"

From Mi'gmaq Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 21: Line 21:
 
|-
 
|-
 
! scope="row" |  12
 
! scope="row" |  12
| mijjiegup
+
| mijjigup
| mijjultiegup
+
| mijjultigup
 
|-
 
|-
 
! scope="row" colspan="2" |  2
 
! scope="row" colspan="2" |  2

Revision as of 12:08, 30 January 2014

Evidentiality is the grammatical encoding of information source on the verb. Mi'gmaq has two markers---p(n) and -s((p)n). Mi’gmaq has two clear evidential markers—the direct and indirect marker, -p(n) and -s(n), respectively. These mark source of information, whether firsthand or non-firsthand. Whenever -p(n) is used a past tense reading applies. The indirect marker is also used in the past tense and also surfaces in future tense environments (Inglis & Johnson, 2001). The direct and indirect markers have two forms—-p, -pn and -s, -sn, respectively. Morphosyntactic constraints dictate, which form surfaces: the n is dropped word-finally except in embedded clauses (Loughran, 2012).

Direct marker

The direct marker, -p(n), always conveys a past tense interpretation. This marker is used when the speaker has direct evidence or is certain of the event he or she is uttering.

mijji- 'eat'
↓person / number→ SG DU PL
1 13 mijjiap mijjieg'p mijjultieg'p
12 mijjigup mijjultigup
2 mijji't'p mijjioqop mijjultioqop
3 mijjip mijjipnig mijjultipnig

Indirect marker

Allomorph of the indirect marker

Indirect marker in questions

Indirect marker in the future