Difference between revisions of "Evidentiality"
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
|- | |- | ||
! scope="row" | 12 | ! scope="row" | 12 | ||
− | | | + | | mijjigup |
− | | | + | | mijjultigup |
|- | |- | ||
! scope="row" colspan="2" | 2 | ! scope="row" colspan="2" | 2 |
Revision as of 12:08, 30 January 2014
Evidentiality is the grammatical encoding of information source on the verb. Mi'gmaq has two markers---p(n) and -s((p)n). Mi’gmaq has two clear evidential markers—the direct and indirect marker, -p(n) and -s(n), respectively. These mark source of information, whether firsthand or non-firsthand. Whenever -p(n) is used a past tense reading applies. The indirect marker is also used in the past tense and also surfaces in future tense environments (Inglis & Johnson, 2001). The direct and indirect markers have two forms—-p, -pn and -s, -sn, respectively. Morphosyntactic constraints dictate, which form surfaces: the n is dropped word-finally except in embedded clauses (Loughran, 2012).
Direct marker
The direct marker, -p(n), always conveys a past tense interpretation. This marker is used when the speaker has direct evidence or is certain of the event he or she is uttering.
↓person / number→ | SG | DU | PL | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 13 | mijjiap | mijjieg'p | mijjultieg'p |
12 | mijjigup | mijjultigup | ||
2 | mijji't'p | mijjioqop | mijjultioqop | |
3 | mijjip | mijjipnig | mijjultipnig |