Difference between revisions of "Nouns"

From Mi'gmaq Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 99: Line 99:
 
As mentioned before, these relationships aren't always strictly of ownership, but can be interpreted as a type of closeness or relatedness--so while the umbrella may be my possession in the strictest sense of the word, we also shouldn't think of Tom's sister being ''his'' possession. Instead, we use possession to show that a relationship exists between the two nouns in question.
 
As mentioned before, these relationships aren't always strictly of ownership, but can be interpreted as a type of closeness or relatedness--so while the umbrella may be my possession in the strictest sense of the word, we also shouldn't think of Tom's sister being ''his'' possession. Instead, we use possession to show that a relationship exists between the two nouns in question.
  
Mi'gmaq possession has one very important feature that English speakers will have to get used to. This is related to the idea of '''alienability'''. So when something is '''alienable''', the relationship between the two nouns; "my umbrella" shows an alienable relationship, because I can give away the umbrella, and then it is no longer mine and the relationship dissolves. "Tom's sister," however, shows an '''inalienable''' relationship because no matter what, Tom and his sister will always be related.
+
Mi'gmaq possession has one very important feature that English speakers will have to get used to. This is related to the idea of '''alienability'''. So when something is '''alienable''', the relationship between the two nouns is changeable; "my umbrella" shows an alienable relationship, because I can give away the umbrella, and then it is no longer mine and the relationship dissolves. "Tom's sister," however, shows an '''inalienable''' relationship because no matter what, Tom and his sister will always be related.
  
 
Mi'gmaq inalienable nouns include...
 
Mi'gmaq inalienable nouns include...

Revision as of 06:31, 10 May 2012

Nouns in general are words that refer to persons, places, or things. Some randomly-selected examples of English nouns include the words "Listuguj," "Mary," "woman," and "table." These words are also nouns in Mi'gmaq: "Listuguj," "Mali," "epit," and "ptauti."

In some ways, Mi'gmaq nouns resemble English nouns (for instance, you can have singular and plural versions of a noun). In other ways, they differ from English (for instance, there is a feature of nouns that we call "animacy" that English doesn't really display).

Number

For more detail, see Number

"Number" refers to how many of something there are. In both English and Mi'gmaq, there are two numbers for nouns: singular (only one of something) and plural (two or more of something). In English, a plural noun often looks like the singular plus an -s at the end, for example, "girl" becomes "girls." In Mi'gmaq, there are two things you can add to a noun in order to make it plural, depending on whether the noun is animate or inanimate (for more information on these terms, see the next section). For inanimate nouns, like ptawti "table" as shown in (1), you generally add -l to the end of the word (or sometimes you make the last sound of the word longer). For animate nouns, like jinm "man" as shown in (2), you add -ug or -ig or -oq depending on the particular noun.

  1. ptawti,  ptawti-l  
    table,   table-PL  
    'table, tables'
  1. jinm,  jinm-ug  
    man,   man-PL   
    'man, men'

If you've looked at number in Mi'gmaq verbs, you may have noticed that Mi'gmaq verbs make a distinction between singular, dual (two participants), and plural (three or more participants). However, for nouns, the only distinction is between one and more than one.

Counting

For more detail, see Measure words

Animacy

For more detail, see Animacy

All nouns in Mi'gmaq belong to one of two categories, animate and inanimate. Animate nouns generally refer to things that are alive, such as people or animals, but other words such as containers and some types of food or clothing can also be animate. Inanimate nouns generally refer to things that are not alive, such as places and objects like rocks and tables. Some examples are below:

  1. lpatuj  
    boy.AN  
    'boy (animate)'
  1. mu'in    
    bear.AN  
    'bear (animate)'
  1. tuop'ti      
    window.INAN  
    'window (inanimate)'
  1. guntew     
    rock.INAN  
    'rock (inanimate)'

Animacy is important because it influences how to make the plural of a noun, and what form of verb to use with it. This also means that if you see a noun in a sentence and you want to try to figure out whether it it is animate or inanimate, there are a few things you can look for in addition to meaning: if its plural is -ug/-ig/-oq/-g, then it's animate, or if it's -l/long consonant then it's inanimate (see the section above for examples). If the noun is the subject of a sentence, then it's almost definitely animate, because only animate beings can do things. If the noun is the object of a sentence, the verb will have a different form depending on whether it's a VTA (animate) or VTI (inanimate).

  1. nemi-g  epit      
    see-TA  woman.AN  
    'I see the woman'
  1. nemi-tu  ptauti      
    see-TI   table.INAN  
    'I see the table'

Some words can change from being animate to inanimate. For example, the names of animals are animate, but when you eat their meat, the meat is inanimate. This is expressed by adding the ending -ewei to the name of the animal.

  1. plamu   
    salmon  
    'salmon (live fish)'
  1. plamu-ewei   
    salmon-EWEI  
    'salmon meat, salmon steak'

Possession

For more detail, see Possession

Possession covers a whole range of relationships between nouns, not necessarily relationships where there is a possession and an owner. In English, possession covers expressions such as:

  • my umbrellas
  • Tom's sister
  • Jamie's leg
  • a friend of Alice's
  • the music of Beethoven

The verbs used in these sentences can also be thought of as "possessive":

  • I have a cake.
  • This dog belongs to me.

As mentioned before, these relationships aren't always strictly of ownership, but can be interpreted as a type of closeness or relatedness--so while the umbrella may be my possession in the strictest sense of the word, we also shouldn't think of Tom's sister being his possession. Instead, we use possession to show that a relationship exists between the two nouns in question.

Mi'gmaq possession has one very important feature that English speakers will have to get used to. This is related to the idea of alienability. So when something is alienable, the relationship between the two nouns is changeable; "my umbrella" shows an alienable relationship, because I can give away the umbrella, and then it is no longer mine and the relationship dissolves. "Tom's sister," however, shows an inalienable relationship because no matter what, Tom and his sister will always be related.

Mi'gmaq inalienable nouns include...

  • body parts (i.e. 'gpitn, "your hand," and nunji, "my head")
  • family members (i.e. nuj, "my father," and ugmisl "his/her big sister")
  • a couple exceptions (i.e. nitap, "my friend" is inalienable, even though it's a relationship that might change.)

Mi'gmaq alienable nouns include...

  • everything else (i.e. 'gtsipuminu, "our river," and 'ntptautim, "my table," and ugtwigatign "his/her book," and so on and so forth)

Pronouns

For more detail, see Pronouns

A pronoun is a word that can substitute for a noun that is already known from the context of the conversation.

  • Q: What did Mary do with the book?
  • A: Mary gave the book to Peter. (all nouns - sounds too long)
  • A: She gave it to him. (all pronouns - we don't know who "him" is)
  • A: She gave it to Peter. (pronouns for known information, nouns for new information - sounds more natural)
  • A: She gave it to me. (ok as long as we know who is talking so we know who "me" is)

Some examples of pronouns in English are I, me, you, he, she, her, him, it, we, us, they, and them. Pronouns can be classified in several ways. First of all, just like nouns, there are singular and plural pronouns in Mi'gmaq. Secondly, pronouns are different depending on the situation that they refer to, which is referred to as person. So if the person or group who is speaking is talking about themself, then this is the first person (English "I/me/we/us"). The person or group that the speaker is talking to is the second person (English "you"), and an additional person or group is the third person (English "she/he/him/her/they/them"). Unlike English, Mi'gmaq also makes a distinction when talking about yet another person or group in addition to the third: the obviative, also sometimes called the fourth person.

Below we can see a table of Mi'gmaq pronouns, organized according to number and person. An additional thing to notice is that Mi'gmaq makes a distinction between when someone is talking on behalf of a group that includes the listener (first person inclusive) and when the group does not include the listener (first person exclusive).

Singular Dual/Plural
13 (excl) ni'n ninen
12 (incl) n/a ginu
2 gi'l gilew
3 negm negmow

Mi'gmaq uses pronouns in somewhat different contexts compared to how English does. In English, you can't tell from a verb by itself who is doing the action or who has the action being done to them. For example, "see" doesn't tell us anything about who is seeing or being seen, so the only way to know this is by having nouns or pronouns. Mi'gmaq verbs do give you this information. For example, nemi'g can only mean that "I see an animate thing," and if we want to change who/what is seeing or being seen we have change parts of the verb (much more information about this in the Verbs section). This means that it isn't necessary to use pronouns to express this information again, since we already know it. Saying ni'n nemitu negm is therefore not quite like saying "I see him/her". Since we didn't have to use ni'n or negm, the fact that we're choosing to say them means that we want to emphasize these particular people. For example, if someone asked you "Did she see you?" you might want to emphasize the opposite by saying "No, it was me that saw her", but in a normal sentence you probably wouldn't bother to do this.

Demonstratives

For more detail, see Demonstratives

Obviation

For more detail, see Obviation

Diminutive

For more detail, see Diminutives