Difference between revisions of "Evidentiality"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Evidentiality is the grammatical encoding of information source on the verb. Mi'gmaq has two markers--''-p(n)'' and ''-s((p)n)''. | Evidentiality is the grammatical encoding of information source on the verb. Mi'gmaq has two markers--''-p(n)'' and ''-s((p)n)''. | ||
| + | Mi’gmaq has two clear evidential markers—the direct and indirect marker, -p(n) and -s(n), respectively. These mark source of information, whether firsthand or non-firsthand. Whenever -p(n) is used a past tense reading applies. The indirect marker is also used in the past tense and also surfaces in future tense environments (Inglis & Johnson, 2001). The direct and indirect | ||
| + | markers have two forms—-p, -pn and -s, -sn, respectively. Morphosyntactic constraints dictate, which form surfaces: the n is dropped word-finally except in embedded clauses (Loughran, 2012). Example 6, an embedded clause, shows an environment where the n is retained. | ||
=Direct marker= | =Direct marker= | ||
Revision as of 09:53, 28 January 2014
Evidentiality is the grammatical encoding of information source on the verb. Mi'gmaq has two markers---p(n) and -s((p)n). Mi’gmaq has two clear evidential markers—the direct and indirect marker, -p(n) and -s(n), respectively. These mark source of information, whether firsthand or non-firsthand. Whenever -p(n) is used a past tense reading applies. The indirect marker is also used in the past tense and also surfaces in future tense environments (Inglis & Johnson, 2001). The direct and indirect markers have two forms—-p, -pn and -s, -sn, respectively. Morphosyntactic constraints dictate, which form surfaces: the n is dropped word-finally except in embedded clauses (Loughran, 2012). Example 6, an embedded clause, shows an environment where the n is retained.