Difference between revisions of "Evidentiality"

From Mi'gmaq Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Evidentiality is the grammatical encoding of information source on the verb. Mi'gmaq has two markers--''-p(n)'' and ''-s((p)n)''.
 
Evidentiality is the grammatical encoding of information source on the verb. Mi'gmaq has two markers--''-p(n)'' and ''-s((p)n)''.
 
Mi’gmaq has two clear evidential markers—the direct and indirect marker, -p(n) and -s(n), respectively. These mark source of information, whether firsthand or non-firsthand. Whenever -p(n) is used a past tense reading applies. The indirect marker is also used in the past tense and also surfaces in future tense environments (Inglis & Johnson, 2001). The direct and indirect
 
Mi’gmaq has two clear evidential markers—the direct and indirect marker, -p(n) and -s(n), respectively. These mark source of information, whether firsthand or non-firsthand. Whenever -p(n) is used a past tense reading applies. The indirect marker is also used in the past tense and also surfaces in future tense environments (Inglis & Johnson, 2001). The direct and indirect
markers have two forms—-p, -pn and -s, -sn, respectively. Morphosyntactic constraints dictate, which form surfaces: the n is dropped word-finally except in embedded clauses (Loughran, 2012). Example 6, an embedded clause, shows an environment where the n is retained.
+
markers have two forms—-p, -pn and -s, -sn, respectively. Morphosyntactic constraints dictate, which form surfaces: the n is dropped word-finally except in embedded clauses (Loughran, 2012).  
  
 
=Direct marker=
 
=Direct marker=
 +
The direct marker, ''-p(n)'', always conveys a past tense interpretation. This marker is used when the speaker has direct evidence or is certain of the event he or she is uttering.
 +
  
 
=Indirect marker=
 
=Indirect marker=

Revision as of 13:02, 30 January 2014

Evidentiality is the grammatical encoding of information source on the verb. Mi'gmaq has two markers---p(n) and -s((p)n). Mi’gmaq has two clear evidential markers—the direct and indirect marker, -p(n) and -s(n), respectively. These mark source of information, whether firsthand or non-firsthand. Whenever -p(n) is used a past tense reading applies. The indirect marker is also used in the past tense and also surfaces in future tense environments (Inglis & Johnson, 2001). The direct and indirect markers have two forms—-p, -pn and -s, -sn, respectively. Morphosyntactic constraints dictate, which form surfaces: the n is dropped word-finally except in embedded clauses (Loughran, 2012).

Direct marker

The direct marker, -p(n), always conveys a past tense interpretation. This marker is used when the speaker has direct evidence or is certain of the event he or she is uttering.


Indirect marker

Allomorph of the indirect marker

Indirect marker in questions

Indirect marker in the future